Judith Butler’s missing 10 percent
2 Korean blog post interrogated how the Judith Butler’s ‘Gender Trouble’ mis-cited Dr. Page’s paper on the chromosomal which decides biological sexuality. J. Butler cited Dr. Page’s paper to assert that ‘a good ten percent of the population has chromosomal variations that do not fit nearly into the XX-female and XY-male set of categories.’ But 2 Korean bloggers found that Dr. Page had never publicized that sort of experimental results.
1st interrogation; 주디스 버틀러의 10%
and 2nd. 10% 의 진실: 말이 몇 다리를 건너면 어떻게 바뀌나 (수정).
At least, we can have a chance to speculate that the academic errors can be corrected ever faster than the age of non-internet, especially of Google Scholar service. :-0 If you have background knowledge how J. Butler has been highlighted by her academical achievements in the field of philosophy, especially in the area of gender and sexuality with sociocultural insight, this fallacy seems very critical or even very hard to ignore.
About this entry
You’re currently reading “Judith Butler’s missing 10 percent,” an entry on multiplicité
- Published:
- Friday, April 10th, 2009 at 12:50 am
- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Korea.
- Author:
- vizualizer
- Category:
- aesthetics, read and feel, theory
- Tags:
- gender, Judith Butler
Similar Posts
- Bach, The Goldberg Variations, Glenn Gould
- good design@serizine
- vizster; visualizing online social network
- Game as a combination of wayfinding and navigation, based on the information behavior
- TextFormat & TextField
- Trace Bitmap(트레이스 비트맵) 을 위한 설정값 안내
- The Daniel Langlois Foundation for Art, Science, and Technology
- Philips Steps up Rollable-Display Development
- 열두 줄의 20세기 디자인사
- 10 in 2004
No comments
Jump to comment form | comments rss | trackback uri